Michael Carrick's nomination for the Premier League Manager of the Season award is a controversial one. While he has undoubtedly impressed during his time in charge at Manchester United, the fact that he has only managed 15 league games is a significant factor that should be considered. In my opinion, the award should go to someone who has shown consistent excellence over a longer period of time. Keith Andrews, for example, has defied the odds at Brentford, leading them on a charge towards Europe after losing key players. Andrews' achievement is all the more remarkable given the challenges he faced. What makes this particularly fascinating is the contrast between Carrick's temporary role and Andrews' long-term impact. While Carrick has undoubtedly done a good job, the award should recognize the manager who has shown the most sustained excellence. From my perspective, the nomination of Carrick feels like a nod to his association with Manchester United rather than a reflection of his actual managerial prowess. This raises a deeper question: should the Manager of the Season award prioritize short-term impact or long-term vision? In my view, the latter should be the case. The award should go to the manager who has shown the most consistent ability to lead their team to success, regardless of the duration of their tenure. This would set a more meaningful standard for managerial excellence in the Premier League.
